!-- Whatsapp Share Buttons Start -->

Latest Updates / Blogroll

.... AIPEU GROUP - 'C' IS TO CONDUCT ALL ITS STRUGGLE PROGRAMMES UNDER THE BANNER OF POSTAL JCA ....

.... THE JCA SUBMMITTED THE MEMORANDUM TO 7TH CPC ON 23.7.2014 ....

…. NFPE & GDS (NFPE) FILED A CASE IN SUPREME COURT PRAYING : IMPLEMENTATION OF 1977 JUDGEMENT AND DECLARE GDS ARE CIVIL SERVANTS & SCRAP THE GDS (CONDUCT & ENGAGEMENT) RULES 2011 AS THEY ARE INVALID AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL ....

…. SUPREME COURT DIRECTED THE CASE TO DELHI HIGH COURT .. FIRST HEARING WAS ON 13-01-2014 AND PLEASED TO SERVE NOTICE TO GOVT. & DEPARTMENT....

.... NEXT HEARING ON 07-05-2014 NEXT HEARING ON 07-05-2014 ....

APPEAL

APPEAL

UNION SUBSCRIPTION

.... AIPEU GROUP - 'C' UNION SUBSCRIPTION DETAILS ....

.... ALL INDIA UNION / CHQ QUOTA = RS 13 + CIRCLE UNION QUOTA = RS 12 + DIVISIONAL / BRANCH UNION QUOTA = RS 25, TOTAL = RS 50....
.... AIPEU POSTMEN & MTS UNION SUBSCRIPTION DETAILS ....


.... NFPE = Rs 2 + ALL INDIA UNION / CHQ QUOTA = RS 10 + CIRCLE UNION QUOTA = RS 10 + DIVISIONAL / BRANCH UNION QUOTA = RS 18, TOTAL = RS 40....

DHENKANAL POSTAL DIVISION AT A GLANCE

Friday, December 30, 2016

Why Were Rs 1,000, Rs 500 Notes Demonetised, RBI Won't Give Reasons


NEW DELHI | PTITHU, 29 DEC 2016 17:30 IST
Fifty days after the government announced that these notes would cease to be legal tender, RBI feels that the reasons behind the announcement cannot be made public.
Why were Rs 1000 and Rs 500 notes demonetised by the government? Fifty days after the government announced that these notes would cease to be legal tender, Reserve Bank of India feels that the reasons behind the sudden announcement cannot be made public.
The monetary policy regulator also refused to give any details about the time it will take to replenish the currency notes.
"The query is in the nature of seeking future date of an event which is not defined as information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act," RBI said in response to an RTI query. The Bankers' Bank refused to disclose reasons behind the demonetisation of about Rs 20 lakh crore of currency in the country citing Section 8(1)(a) of the Right to Information Act.
The section states, "Information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of the State, relation with foreign State or lead to incitement of an offence."
Denying the information sought in the RTI application, the RBI did not give any reasons as to how exemption would apply in the given case as the decision was already taken and there was no way that disclosure of information would have fit in any of the reasons cited in section 8(1)(a) of the RTI Act.
"The clause of public interest would apply where exemption clause applies on the information sought by an applicant. In the present case, the information sought does not attract any exemption clause," former Central Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi told PTI.
He said law is very clear that when a public authority rejects to disclose an information it must give clear reasons as to how the exemption clause would apply in the given case. Recently, it had refused to allow access to minutes of meetings held to decide on the issue of demonetisation of Rs 1000 and Rs 500 notes announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on November 8.
Responding to an RTI application filed by activist Venkatesh Nayak, the Banker's Bank refused to disclose the minutes of the crucial meetings of Central Board of Directors on the issue of demonetisation citing section 8(1)(a) of the transparency law.
Nayak said he will appeal against the decision, adding, while confidentiality prior to the making of the demonetisation decision is understandable, continued secrecy after the implementation of the decision is difficult to understand when crores of Indians are facing difficulties due to the shortage of cash in the economy.
He said the refusal to disclose the minutes of the board meeting where the decision was taken is perplexing to say the very least. Former Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi also underlined that RBI has created an in-house "disclosure policy" which is against the letter and spirit of the RTI Act.
Gandhi has also filed a complaint before Central Information Commission against RBI for adopting the policy.

PTI

0 comments:

Post a Comment

IS GENERATOR FUNCTIONAL AT YOUR POST OFFICE ?

IS EARTHING DONE AT YOUR POST OFFICE ?

IS UPS FUNCTIONAL AND GIVING BACK UP AT YOUR POST OFFICE ?

IS THERE A SEPARATE SERVER COMPUTER AT YOUR POST OFFICE ?

IS CASH COUNTING MACHINE AVAILABLE AT YOUR POST OFFICE ?

IS VACUUM CLEANER AVAILABLE AT YOUR POST OFFICE ?

IS THERE ANY SECURITY WATCHMAN AT YOUR POST OFFICE ?

IS FAKE NOTE DETECTOR AVAILABLE AT YOUR POST OFFICE ?

About

ALL THE INFORMATION PUBLISHED IN THIS WEBPAGE IS SUBMITTED BY USERS OR FREE TO DOWNLOAD ON THE INTERNET. I MAKE NO REPRESENTATIONS AS TO ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, CURRECTNESS, SUITABILITY OR VALIDITY OF ANY INFORMATION ON THIS PAGE AND WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DELAYS IN THIS INFORMATION OR ANY LOSSES, INJURIES OR DAMAGES ARISING FROM ITS DISPLAY OR USE. ALL INFORMATION IS PROVIDED ON AN AS-IS BASIS. ALL THE OTHER PAGES YOU VISIT THROUGH THE HYPER LINKS MAY HAVE DIFFERENT PRIVACY POLICIES. IF ANYBODY FEELS THAT HIS/HER DATA HAS BEEN ILLEGALLY PUT IN THIS WEBPAGE OR IF YOU ARE THE RIGHTFUL OWNER OF ANY MATERIAL AND WANT IT REMOVED PLEASE EMAIL ME AT "suryamadhu.talk@gmail.com" AND I WILL REMOVE IT IMMEDIATELY ON DEMAND. ALL THE OTHER STANDARD DISCLAIMERS, TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF TRADEMARK, REGISTERED COPY RIGHT, PATENT ALSO APPLY.
COPY RIGHTS RESERVED WITH AIPEU P3, DHENKANAL DIVISION ( R ) / ( T ) : 2014 : PIONEERS OF THE TRADE UNION MOVEMENT